![]() This tribune also got me to find out that there is a blog dedicated to the “LaTeX fetish”, which sounds to me like an perfect illustration of Internet vigilantism, especially with arguments like “free and open source software has a strong tendency towards being difficult to install and get up and running”. Questions that are specific to TeXmacs are off-topic here, sorry. ![]() But the author also pushes for the lighter (R?)Markdown as, “in LaTeX, there is a greater risk that contributors will make changes that prevent the code compiling into a PDF” (which does not make sense to me). TeXmacs is a program that has nothing in common with TeX and friends, apart from some similarities. Latest version of TeXworks is 0.6.2 and it was. Currently, several standard document styles have been implemented: generic, article, book, letter, exam, beamer, seminar, source. Besides the long-running whine that LaTeX is not he selling argument for this article seemed to be the increasing facility to use (basic) LaTeX commands in forums (like Stack Exchange) and blogs (like WordPress) via MathJax. It is a Qt-based graphical user interface to the typesetting system TeX and its extensions LaTeX, ConTeXt, and. After selecting a document style in Document Style, TeXmacs takes care of specific layout issues, such as numbering of sections, pages, theorems, typesetting citations and footnotes in a nice way and so on. ![]() Nature must have been out of inspiration in the past weeks for running a two-page article on L aT eX and how it compares with… Word! Which is not so obvious since most articles in Nature are not involving equations (much) and are from fields where Word prevails. TeXmacs is not LaTeX, but its pretty closely related, and what Im interested in is how to produce human-readable, human-editable LaTeX with TeXmacs.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |